Submitted manuscripts will be considered for publication according to their topical relevance and the importance of their contribution to scholarship. The contributions would be accepted based on the recommendations of the double blind peer reviewers, the editorial board. The Law Review will not provide any feedback for desk reviews. The decision to publish or reject each submission would be made within 12 weeks of submission. Submissions would be accepted throughout the year on a rolling basis. All contributions will be made freely available on the Web.

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness and objectivity. Upon submission, each manuscript is first evaluated by the journal’s editorial team to assess its quality and relevance to the journal’s aims and scope. Submissions that meet these initial criteria are then forwarded to at least one external referee and one internal referee for thorough review. The referee’s feedback and recommendations play a central role in the editorial decision-making process. Based on these evaluations, the manuscript may be accepted, rejected, or returned to the author with a request for revision. If revisions are requested, authors are invited to resubmit their manuscript after addressing the referees’ comments. The final decision on revised submissions is made by the journal editor, in consultation with members of the advisory board.